On wto, 2017-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 07/25/2017 04:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > I don't feel I should be obligated by policy to support this use case. > > One revbump per push seems sufficiently safe for 99.9% of users. > > > > If you want to do more revbumps, you are free to do so. > > > > Can I also delete packages and break the tree so long as I put > everything back before I push?
That is not the same, and you know that. Plus, there's a major difference between not doing unnecessary work and purposely doing something awful just to prove a point. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
