On 07/25/2017 01:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > There are two main advantages over having the bug number in the summary. > Space is at a premium in the summary, as Tobias pointed out, and the > > Gentoo-Bug: whatever > > format is trivially machine-readable, whereas sticking it somewhere else > is less so.
Indeed, I'm in favor of keeping bug information in this format, whereby Bug: <URL> is fine as a generic reference it will mostly be for upstream issues or other distributions, whereby Gentoo-Bug: #nnnnnn is explicit reference to our own tracker. An issue to consider is definition of this label in terms of whether it takes a single value or a list and how to do wrapping.. I'd likely expect possibility for multiple occurrences for it but allowing multiple bug numbers specified comma separated -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
