On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 07/25/2017 09:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> How is that relevant? Revision bumps are merely a tool to encourage >> 'automatic' rebuilds of packages during @world upgrade. I can't think of >> a single use case where somebody would actually think it sane to >> checkout one commit after another, and run @world upgrade in the middle >> of it. >> > > Revisions are to indicate that one incarnation of a package differs from > another in a way that the user or package manager might care about. And > on principal, it's no business of yours what people want to do with > their tree. If someone wants to check out successive commits and emerge > @world, he's within his rights to do so.
I don't feel I should be obligated by policy to support this use case. One revbump per push seems sufficiently safe for 99.9% of users. If you want to do more revbumps, you are free to do so.
