On 6 February 2016 at 07:19, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > 'd be all for automated bug assignment. Usually when this comes up a > bunch of hero bug wranglers step up and say it isn't needed, because > we have hero bug wranglers. As long as people keep stepping up to do > that I'm not going to tell them that they can't. However, if the bug > queue ever does go out of control I'd be all for just auto-assigning > them. If they rarely get assigned to the wrong people, then they can > just reassign them. And nothing stops us from having a bugzilla query > for "new bugs filed in last 24h" for people who want to take a quick > look at recent bugs for trends or to help clean them up across > projects.
Hm, or alternatively, you could have a scheme where things defaulted in the bug queue, and were auto-assigned where possible after no feedback for a time, or maybe it would be defaulted only when the queue is over a certain size. At least that way the hero's can provide as much quality as they like, and if they get tired and stop triaging bugs, a sensible fallback that's not perfect can fill the gaps. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
