-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer >> <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote:
.. > > > What saddens me the most is that these pointless threads are > becoming sort of a habit not because the reporter is really > offended by the original action, but because he/she uses that to > prove that QA is dying, Gentoo is a zombie, cvs sucks and > elephants could fly. I'm not sure I agree the original thread was pointless. it was a relatively succinct statement that reported a breach of procedure, for which I'd consider the -dev list to be the appropriate place. What is more relevant is how that is being followed up by others afterwards. "Ok, I did a mistake, will remember to check maintainer more closely before bumping a package that is new to me and I'm not familiar enough with to know it is in Herd X" would be a perfectly acceptable answer. - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU5afCAAoJEP7VAChXwav6hu0H/1QSiUkky+VCVOM/B5pNhOJS +GliOVFrQCbQNSkDDXOSpJZ7heBIJ+4Dev+WKYgFJ+fPvBca64DpIdfJ9NrJMgEz AwQMofVf0M6dT7Of7ocvDUbArL5J4ps6iHdmw/YNf5GdUEfnOZM6R8IaQbzeZnio F0MZvVPJvH+juuUoKsSRkzhREc1y5bWiyiTwm8m2ePfnm9jYrUqk5l1621fxeevs 8n77eKtQMSH67IgHNrITx29EnLKD+zqQVLjUsQg4fPhvwD6pdxDK7CJ7wr0uBtTI nUXslVO5I+r7njKFd2EVYlCs0QgEPJZTQBIepX+Jy8Cp4c5zrQm4ppSFe6FcIas= =FMBk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
