On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:41:23 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>On 28/02/14 16:41, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>
>>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an
>>> ebuild, if user hasn't
>>> set otherwise.
>>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is
>>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d"
>>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}"
>>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting
>>> themself in the foot
>>>
>>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills
>>> to make that happen w/
>>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open
>>> a feature request bug?
>>>
>> No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths.
>>
>> Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks.
>>
>
>You should stop attacking people. Period.Once you stop trying to make things worse in Gentoo I will consider stopping my attacks... so it's up to you. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
