On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an
>ebuild, if user hasn't
>set otherwise.
>So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is
>"env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d"
>So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}"
>This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting themself
>in the foot
>
>The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills to
>make that happen w/
>sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open a
>feature request bug?
>No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths. Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
