28.02.2014 18:44, Samuli Suominen пишет: > > On 28/02/14 16:18, Tom Wijsman wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 >> Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an >>> ebuild, ... >> What is the intended goal? Can you give an example? > > - User has INSTALL_MASK="/lib/systemd" > - Ebuild has INSTALL_MASK_OVERRIDE="/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd > /lib/systemd/network" > - Portage's default is to respect ebuild first, then users setting, > unless he changes INSTALL_MASK_ORDER to respect his > > I completely agree using INSTALL_MASK is 100% responsibility of the user > setting it, it's like blind 'rm -f', but some people > don't agree and keep attacking me. > I'm using the word attacking because it's constant, relentless, > repeating and I don't see an end to it. I believe Poly-C just > proofed that point in this thread. >
If the user set INSTALL_MASK improperly than he(read as 'He, NOT package maintainer') should fix the stuff if it will break. We allow user's to update glibc if they accidently set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~arch(even if downgrading it is really PITA), why we should behave differently here? -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
