Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I don't know about general consensus. In my opinion, it's plain spam to >> existing users. (And that would IMO be the xth news item in a row to be >> spam.) > Can't say I agree here. Some news items have been more useful than > others, but I doubt the typical Gentoo user (who does not subscribe to > -dev) would think that many of the past messages have been spam. > > << SNIP >> > > Rich > >
I agree with this. I see messages that may not apply to me but I always keep in mind that it may apply to a large number of other users. I would MUCH rather see a message sent out that doesn't apply to me than to not see one that should have been sent out but wasn't. Just a users opinion and expectations. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
