On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:34:56 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 12/07/12 10:20 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:43:57 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > > <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >> > >> On 12/07/12 01:01 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > >>> On 12 July 2012 07:42, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:42PM +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Il 11/07/2012 21:11, William Hubbs ha scritto: > >>>>>> I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move > >>>>>> everything currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. > >>>>> > >>>>> Unless you're going to establish a symlink, please keep it > >>>>> under p.mask until everything is using some common code — > >>>>> otherwise things _will_ break. > >>>> > >>>> Since multiple packages put things in /lib/udev, I'm not sure > >>>> it is possible to establish a symlink from /lib/udev to > >>>> /usr/lib/udev if that's what you mean; I'll look into it > >>>> though. > >>> > >>> Couldn't you, on udev upgrade, move everything in /lib/udev to > >>> /usr/lib/udev, and then make the symlink? Seems fairly simple > >>> to me, but maybe I'm overlooking something? > >>> > >> > >> A symlink isn't a good idea as, iirc, the new udev still -reads- > >> from both /usr/lib/udev and /lib/udev .. > > > > Does it? I wasn't able to reproduce and wanted to start convincing > > Kay to let it do that... > > > > > > ..i was going by your statement, i guess i misread you (thought you > said that it did, not that it should).. Sorry! I will try to convince upstream to support it that way. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
