-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/07/12 03:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:01:21 +0800 Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > >> On 12 July 2012 07:42, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:42PM +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò >>> wrote: >>>> Il 11/07/2012 21:11, William Hubbs ha scritto: >>>>> I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move >>>>> everything currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. >>>> >>>> Unless you're going to establish a symlink, please keep it >>>> under p.mask until everything is using some common code — >>>> otherwise things _will_ break. >>> >>> Since multiple packages put things in /lib/udev, I'm not sure >>> it is possible to establish a symlink from /lib/udev to >>> /usr/lib/udev if that's what you mean; I'll look into it >>> though. >> >> Couldn't you, on udev upgrade, move everything in /lib/udev to >> /usr/lib/udev, and then make the symlink? Seems fairly simple to >> me, but maybe I'm overlooking something? > > You are overlooking conflicts introduced through moving files > without updating vardb. >
There were no vdb issues when baselayout-1 was migrated to baselayout-2, and it rewrote a whackload of stuff iirc... Updating vdb shouldn't be an issue here, as long as pkg_postinst doesn't crash mid-stream. Is the vdb common between package managers or does each one have a different solution? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk/+1XUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBKdgD/S3jlct63PVIKE8UmHW4jEanZ T2/lgnF/cUzTSlsyrEQA/iQWSvOcowsgI/r2VUlJLFpltNVea/f8pm5wKq5F4cjk =HA5O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
