-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/11/2012 07:48 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> How do you plan to handle the following: >> - foo installs an udev rule >> - install foo with old udev >> - upgrade udev >> >> are rules installed by foo used by new udev ? > > No, they wouldn't be; that is a good reason to question the value of the > eclass itself. Maybe the correct way to do this is to forget the eclass > and just file bugs against packages that break having them move their > rules to the new location and set a dependency on the newer udev. Perhaps a new ebuild helper would be best here? It seems no one knows where to install udev rules in the first place (I know I didn't till a recent version of portage yelled at me with a QA warning).
How about dorule/newrule? - -Zero > > This would have to be a rev bump for the broken packages. > > William > >> >> A. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP/jWIAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKwPUP/25MRtz2WYr/ajnGIFks7Rge KFlCkIVILejW/5Bh2Ct+OUhcIcT26lENIyRi+agXxvmI6eO5RwWFz1uqinM10dc5 eQ2rdq+SzM5yrRDuy3aQRNSpemGPIT9Rnmz+/JwgqaeEbl5qMLglqIjZcU9sL675 bfFF0n6y2/HuSFY1kZ6elK5A4UBnM3LRVl6DYZlYPH0/KzSYo03qQlgrUKzODaZ6 C+d1Ctd1g8yCuMmrk2QvAuPO1dxNJHV6zWIQFmuVOZrDKxoQyiS73HwG53oeqwN1 Ig1tZo9X8co4gb8f6YcxxG6tAligqMXRbBCHwdZh1JEeLfAtA6hFxmVZ4u+Ldj9W Eco1MAGSX3qoUfoEJQeI49AcjMIkIBHR7kyvl7/IJ10xjI1QWsa9Cx2kkowaGbCw CuNlqmMLsAyOVDXdAoW/ODC/2ntNsnigv8J5m6kJ2sUzzGVzU2q1VBxkTfLQkkD4 1H0nReTSo3ilNN9ZpsBEer+xMz1xsXssDbkQGXxRi0modKYUe2z9JZ0bJweFDn2I ixEooL6D67TFS3lhkScGA0S4WO1lUO+Ih1cb6SPvGOpx+R6A+o1IYWC3utdIB1ho mGDyK8NB9fNgP3B5PAjACWPoTSs4IMRIiLBMfCIperbPNrAFGrzwJcbLnxaNy7KY l5ug3XKuM/B2yZdxyzSu =8j1W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
