On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote: > How do you plan to handle the following: > - foo installs an udev rule > - install foo with old udev > - upgrade udev > > are rules installed by foo used by new udev ?
No, they wouldn't be; that is a good reason to question the value of the eclass itself. Maybe the correct way to do this is to forget the eclass and just file bugs against packages that break having them move their rules to the new location and set a dependency on the newer udev. This would have to be a rev bump for the broken packages. William > > A. >
pgptwsPXj4sgH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
