Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:34:34 -0600
Dale<rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:40:01 -0600
Dale<rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
I keep hoping that all the smart people involved in this will see
the mess it is creating. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed
but I'm sharp enough to see the mess this is going to create and
I'm just a desktop user. I feel sorry for people with more
complicated systems or remote ones.
The mess was created by people shouting 'hey, real men use
separate /usr for no good reason! Be awesome like us'.
I think it is more like people do that when they have a good reason
to do so. I plan to put mine on /usr when I get the chance and
know that this init crap isn't going to break my rig. It's not
being "awesome" either.
Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were
mostly hacks and laziness.
I already stated the reason. I'm going to put /usr on LVM. That is
not only a good reason, it is a GREAT reason.
It is a hack.
How is putting /usr, /var, /home and such on LVM a hack? Your
definition of hack must have some really low standards. Does installing
Linux fall into your "hack" category to?
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how
you interpreted my words!
Miss the compile output? Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"