On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:44:31 +0100 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: > > >> I think it is more like people do that when they have a good reason > >> to do so. I plan to put mine on /usr when I get the chance and > >> know that this init crap isn't going to break my rig. It's not > >> being "awesome" either. > > > Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were > > mostly hacks and laziness. > > /usr can be mounted readonly, while / and /var cannot? What is the point of mounting the less important part of the system read-only while the more important one is writable? Also, it should be possible to mount rootfs read-only with separate /var. Of course, that would require the software to be actually FHS-compliant and not put runtime-written files in /etc. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
