On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:03:50 +0100 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:44:31 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > >> I think it is more like people do that when they have a good > > >> reason to do so. I plan to put mine on /usr when I get the > > >> chance and know that this init crap isn't going to break my > > >> rig. It's not being "awesome" either. > > > > > Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were > > > mostly hacks and laziness. > > > > /usr can be mounted readonly, while / and /var cannot? > > What is the point of mounting the less important part of the system > read-only while the more important one is writable? > > Also, it should be possible to mount rootfs read-only with > separate /var. Of course, that would require the software to be > actually FHS-compliant and not put runtime-written files in /etc. > security? -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
