On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:58:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > >>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. > >> > >> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the > >> tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the > >> depgraph. > > > > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. > > I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary.
this isn't helping the conversation -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
