On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >> Mike Frysinger schrieb: >>>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. >>> >>> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree >>> with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph. >> >> The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. > > I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary.
Come on. That's ridiculous, and nothing but trolling. Don't do that. Like in the pngcrush thread, miscommunications all around. Matt
