On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:27:41 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > >> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. > > > > by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the > > tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the > > depgraph. > > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before.
which is what i said -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
