On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:23:35 +0200 Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Friday 16 September 2005 22:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > That's not my idea. That's policy. I just happen to a) have actually | > read what policy says and b) agree with it. | | First: I know you're proposing this regularly, but please show me the | policy - I'm sure your interpretation doesn't match mine.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=1 > There is a difference between using package.mask and ~arch for > ebuilds. The use of ~arch denotes an ebuild requires testing. The use > of package.mask denotes that the application or library itself is > deemed unstable. | Second: a) and b) doesn't match what's going on with large parts of | the tree Good time for package maintainers to start following policy properly, eh? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpWkh8wb13nI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
