On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:50:39PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > actually, going with say 'testing.mask' instead of '?arch' may be better ... > reinforce the fact that this is a package-level issue rather than > arch-specific
Let me get things straight. We would want this because it's the least of two evils? On one hand ?arch isn't nice because it's package-level instead of arch-specific, so it doesn't belong among keywords. On the other hand testing.mask (if it's like package.mask) takes this (package-level) stuff and moves it out of the ebuilds it belongs to and dumps it all in one file. So we'd want this because we don't want to introduce something new in the ebuilds? Just getting things straight before expressing my opinion explicitly =] Maurice. -- Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpdCM9aKrnq7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
