On Friday 16 September 2005 23:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: > actually, going with say 'testing.mask' instead of '?arch' may be better > ... reinforce the fact that this is a package-level issue rather than > arch-specific > -mike
That's nearly as bad as having to deal with package.mask all the time. Keeping the maintainer's opinion on an ebuild outside of it doesn't make any sense. Carsten
pgpSbVWzSfada.pgp
Description: PGP signature
