On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 22:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > There is a difference between using package.mask and ~arch for > > ebuilds. The use of ~arch denotes an ebuild requires testing. The use > > of package.mask denotes that the application or library itself is > > deemed unstable. > | Second: a) and b) doesn't match what's going on with large parts of > | the tree > > Good time for package maintainers to start following policy properly, > eh? Good time for policy to be adapted to match reality ;-)
-- Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
