-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > And - as I told you the last time you brought this issue up - you're > more than welcome to start reviewing ebuilds and commits as well.
I'm starting to do just that. I've even asked Ciaran to review a particular ebuild I was interested in so that I could learn from it. > We have a bugzilla which is open to the public, we have an irc channel > [1] (which is even monitored by CIA [2]) for tracking all commits made > to the portage tree... what more do you want? That is handy, thanks. I don't see the IRC channel listed here: http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/irc.xml So I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and asked to have it added. :) > If you so desperately want code review in Gentoo, why don't you do what > every other open source software developer has to do to get his ideas > through: put some work into it yourself? See above. > I've been wondering: do your emails on this list represent the view of > the IEEE organization? Of course not. But the IEEE *is* all about peer review (as all scientists have been for the last few hundred years). And here is a nice high-level article about the benefits of peer review while developing software for the non-believers :) http://www.visibleprogress.com/peer_reviews.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDCItE2QTTR4CNEQARAtWfAJoDGYt/o6afKSL/7VCxFuAJNYZfHQCgp9N0 K9f5keHUSdyd5nat4rit6EM= =kXk/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
