-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jon Portnoy wrote: > I hate to be the bearer of bad news
Somehow, I doubt that... ;) > but that's because you don't realize > how many devs are sitting back and giggling at this thread 8) I didn't realize you got together with other devs for giggle fests! ;) > You've pretty much hijacked this thread to rant and rave about QA; we're > already aware of QA problems, And yet I see scarce few ideas on how to solve the problem. The only other person who seems to have any are Ciaran, and what is his solution? He's doing *code reviews* of ebuilds. *GASP* Imagine that! > the reason nobody is listening to you in > this thread is not that nobody cares, it's that your ideas (well.. I > guess I've mostly only seen one..) have not been practical or useful for > reasons already explained. The only reason I've seen, besides "I don't wanna" and "how dare you question my l33t code skills", is the manpower/time issue. But my work experience tells me that the sooner you find a bug, the easier/faster it is to squash. So although my little idea *will* take time up front, it has the /potential/ to save much more time later on. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDCIAX2QTTR4CNEQARAuOlAKCH97nGjDuI4VJnhIqNqeqARK9P5gCbBi5w nsTXa8Du1uQvqnlQhqTUBNo= =GZAK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
