+1 to both in principle (yay), but with admin access not initially given to podling committers; as that could encourage "business as usual" for adding friends&family as committers without a vote.
So I agree that the transition of the existing repositories need to be handled well. On 7 Nov 2016 10:23 pm, "Chris Mattmann" <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has > requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra > Admin > has OK’ed this for OpenWhisk iff the IPMC is OK with it. > > I ask now: > > 1. Is the IPMC OK with this for OpenWhisk? > 2. Is the IPMC OK with this in general availability for Podlings? > > I am +1 on both (IPMC hat on). > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
