It does, Joe, but the IPMC needs to decide whether to even *ask* ... It is an entirely reasonable position to say that focusing primary development at GitHub could hurt some aspect of ASF-style community building, and (thus) the IPMC does not want to allow that.
Infra will start with OpenWhisk (if it becomes a podling and the IPMC agrees with its plan). We'll examine if/how to expand the experiment to future podlings, as requested. So with my IPMC hat on: +1 to both. With my Infra hat on: +1 has already been given to #1. #2 is TBD. Cheers, -g On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Joe Schaefer <joes...@gmail.com> wrote: > With regard to the second question I hope the ultimate decision still rests > with Greg. This idea is fairly new and some baby steps are in order before > opening the floodgates. > > IMO > > On Monday, November 7, 2016, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now > has > > requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra > > Admin > > has OK’ed this for OpenWhisk iff the IPMC is OK with it. > > > > I ask now: > > > > 1. Is the IPMC OK with this for OpenWhisk? > > 2. Is the IPMC OK with this in general availability for Podlings? > > > > I am +1 on both (IPMC hat on). > > > > Thanks. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > <javascript:;> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > <javascript:;> > > > > >
