quick update. 

hg cloned it locally and now batch importing over here.
The hg clone took me 3 hours and the import is now running for 4 hours. 

Maybe that is the problem why github failed.

I'm now at 89000/303000 in the import step. 

If I succeed then I'll push it to github.

LieGrue,
strub





> On Sunday, 18 September 2016, 18:24, Mark Struberg 
> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote:
> > btw, I tried to import the netbeans-core repo from hg into github and it 
> > failed.
> Now trying to manually import it...
> 
> Did anybody else do that?
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>  On Sunday, 18 September 2016, 18:22, Dennis E. Hamilton 
> <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
>>  > +1
>> 
>> 
>>>   -----Original Message-----
>>>   From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
>>>   Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 00:46
>>>   To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>   Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal
>>> 
>>>   On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
>>>   geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>   > Hi all,
>>>   >
>>>   > Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further 
> details
>>>   > specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the 
> proposal?
>>>   My
>>>   > concern is that each question we answer is answered by further
>>>   questions to
>>>   > answer. Maybe we could do a phone conference with the NetBeans
>>>   > infrastructure side together with the Apache infrastructure side.
>>>   Maybe we
>>>   > can work through the infrastructure challenges during incubation.
>>>   >
>>> 
>>>   Generally speaking, Apache would prefer to slow things down and use a
>>>   mailing list, rather than to have a phone conference. The email is
>>>   documented for everybody to review, to participate, and to record for
>>>   future examination. A phone conference probably wouldn't resolve 
> many
>>>   questions/concerns anyway, simply because much of that comes from
>>>   considered thought. A phone call is "THINK NOW. RESPOND. OOPS. 
> MISSED
>>>   YOUR
>>>   CHANCE." ... Mailing lists give people time to think.
>>> 
>>>   There is no rush, no dates, no deadlines at the ASF. It may take 
> longer
>>>   via
>>>   mailing lists, but it means that the larger community can be involved,
>>>   can
>>>   review, and can be archived.
>>> 
>>>   If one question turns into three ... well, that is deliberation. As
>>>   David
>>>   noted else-thread, we rarely get such a large, well-established
>>>   community
>>>   arriving at the Incubator. That necessitates a bit more inquiry than
>>>   most
>>>   other entrants receive. Layers of the onion get peeled, and new
>>>   questions
>>>   arrive. More layers unpeeled ...
>>> 
>>>   And to point to the elephant in the room: I bet there are people
>>>   concerned
>>>   given the recent misadventures of AOO [and Oracle's donations of 
> these
>>>   two
>>>   projects]. Personally, I think it is hogwash, and don't believe 
> any
>>>   concern
>>>   applies here, as the communities and the userbase are very different.
>>>   BUT,
>>>   temporally, there is a conflation of the donations of these two
>>>   projects. I
>>>   suspect that will cause a few people to slow down and ask more
>>>   questions.
>>> 
>>>   Cheers,
>>>   -g
>> 
>> 
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to