On 11/02/2015 07:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen<rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
> >thread, duh...
> >
> >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1
>on
> >the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the
> >project is ready? Looks like a rhetorical question, this one.
>
>No, it's not a rhetorical question at all. I suspect, as I have
>mentioned in other threads, that some people vote +1 on these things
>without doing a whole lot of background checking. Paul's response is
>what I was looking for.
>
>If it's all just rhetorical questions then why do we bother at all?
>Graduation is a one-time thing. We can afford to apply a little
>additional scrutiny to it. This is something we can't afford to get wrong.
>
I certainly hope that people don't just blindly vote +1 on graduation
threads. I know I don't.
Now, if you had asked this same question on the kylin graduation thread,
I'm not sure you'd get as solid of an answer as groovy.
It feels like these two sentiments are at odds with one another, which
is a little worrying.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
