On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > ...that might just be me...
I agree that each of our projects regularly evaluating their state against the maturity model would be useful. We can either make that a requirement (like once a year as part of the board reporting) or make that an optional "quality label" that projects can display on their website, like a regularly updated version of what we're doing for the Groovy podling at [1]. I prefer the latter, a voluntary public report that can be used by the project's community as well as the board as a tool for evaluating the project's health but without imposing more process on our projects. (and as others have said this would be a more a discussion for comdev, it's not incubator-specific) -Bertrand [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
