On 10/15/2015 08:21 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If we are to use the maturity model as the guideline regarding podling
graduation, then certainly the model should be voted on and approved
by the membership as *the* model for the ASF, right?
Basically, it looks to me that the model is proposing and creating policy,
and this is something that needs to be done 'correctly', if you get my
meaning.
+1
This is why, in that other thread, I suggested that mentors voluntarily
evaluate their podlings based on these guidelines, but didn't suggest
any kind of actual policy change or requirement.
--Rich
On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
FYI I have started an experiment at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc ,
using our maturity model to evaluate Groovy before its mentors suggest
its graduation (which should happen very soon).
So far this has helped uncover a few issues that we (at least I)
hadn't noticed otherwise. Nothing major, but interesting, and I think
it can be useful for the IPMC and Board once they have to decide to
graduate the podling.
-Bertrand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
