On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 15/10/15 13:17, Rich Bowen a écrit : > > A huge +1, but I wonder about a few things. Who does the work? > > I guess that each PMC should be responsible for this work, with a dead > line soft enough that it allows each check to be done with no stress, > and under the supervision of some members in charge of helping them. > > > Who > > evaluates the results? > > Either the board, or a group gathered for that purpose. the board? doesn't that become a bottleneck. > > > What happens when projects "fail"? > Well, I guss some corrective actions should be applied. The question is > more about which of the item must be considered as mandatory, and which > can simply be considered as optional. > > > Bottom line, we most certainly will have to create a group of > volunteers, for a limited period of time, a bit like the shepperds we > have in Incubator. > > <side note> > Actually, I think that at some point, we will need to audit each project > periodically to check if they respect the various rules we now have (and > that includes checking the N&L, a task that sebb is doing - and he > deserves some respect for that ! -, and other aspects relative to the > web site, the packages, etc...). But this is just something I feel in my > guts, not something I see as necessary atm. I certainly don't want The > ASF to become a giant buraucracy !!! > </side note> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > >
