Le 24/06/15 22:28, David Nalley a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) > <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: >> +1 (to this and Jochen's response) >> >> Roman was explicit in his question about "clearly identifiable non-release >> artifacts available to the general public". We can debate words on a page >> forever, or we can work with the intent and get on with producing software. >> >> There is plenty of precedent here (including the oldest project in the >> foundation). > Link please? because I can't find it, and a couple of folks from the > httpd PMC tell me this isn't the case. > > I don't think there's a problem with snapshots or nightly builds being > available. I do think there is a problem with promoting nightly > builds, or even promoting them from the website. > I do think that the Release Policy is binding on projects, and more so > on podlings that haven't kicked out a release yet. > > > > More generally to the underlying issue that prompted this discussion: > With the concrete example of Geode's DockerHub presence, I don't think > it's acceptable: > https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/apachegeode/geode/ > > Specifically, it's promoting folks consume a nightly build. > There's no warning that this hasn't met the ASF standards for > software, or that this project hasn't even pushed out a release yet. > Then there's the fact that the dockerfile isn't even coming from the > ASF it's coming from: https://github.com/markito/geode-docker
That is a clear breach of The ASF release policy, I agree. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
