----- Original Message ----- > From: Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> > To: Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:02 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] PodlingBillOfRights > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Joseph Schaefer > <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> The typical escalation path is either board@ or board-private@ assuming > private messages >> to the chair are ineffective. Most of the time, for most of our projects, > this has worked well enough. > > So isn't learning this bit of information a crucial part of graduation? > After > all, once the project leaves the incubator its commiters and PMC won't have > an access to the Ombudsman, isn't it in all of our best interest to teach > them from the get-go what you've just described above?
Not really, because the type of information we're looking for is about the IPMC, not the podling. > > What's the danger of hooking up poddlings to the very channels they should > be using once they graduate? > >> The real issue for the IPMC boils down to the judgement call of whether the > standard >> escalation procedures are working to everyone's satisfaction, > > Do we have real indication they are not? Isn't this an academic question? Those of us that have been here a while have seen any number of cases where podling committers feel frustrated about the process and powerless to do anything about it. This isn't a new problem. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
