On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, "Chen, Pei" <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: > >> I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings or future >> podlings are aware of these fundamental items (since not everyone may >> subscribe to legal-discuss). >> >> Is this philosophy or policy also true for parts of a code base that are >> intricate to the basic functionality of the software such as icons, gifs, >> jpgs, and statistical models in this case (which were approved to be >> distributed under the same ASL2.0 terms)? > I'm pretty sure that icons, gifs, jpgs are ok in both source and binary > dists. My mental model for source dists is whether the file can do any harm > and what the developer would do to verify its safety. For icons, gifs, > jpgs, I would load them in a display program, and if they contained a virus, > they probably wouldn't load.
> > I don't know what your statistical model is, but I would think of it the > same way. No way. A big model is a giant opportunity for trojan horses. > > The binary dist is just supposed to be a pre-compiled version of the source > dist. >> >> Can those be included in the source or binary dist or both? >> > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
