On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > >> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote: > >> > >> > Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first > >> > struck me > >> > as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect when I read it in my feed > >> > reader: > >> > http://www.robweir.com/blog/2012/06/pache-openoffice-34-downloads.html > >> > >> Following that link in a browser I see there's also a nice but > >> questionable logo: > >> http://www.robweir.com/blog/images/get-aoo-300x100-cf.png > >> If PR are OK with that then fine, but I find it surprising. > >> > > > > With reference to the Podling Branding Guide [1] , the requirement is > that the product be called "Apache OpenOffice". That is the name. > Nothing else. But we're also required to "mention that the project is > under Incubation". There is more than one way of doing that. Also, > "These statements only need to be disclosed upon the first reference > in a document." IMHO, we've done that for the blog posts as hosted on > ASF servers. But it is not clear if or how we control other parties > tweeting links. But I assume if someone feels strongly about > controlling things at that level they will propose a way. > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html > > > > hmm - I suppose you are correct, it shouldn't have the feather and > > should have the incubator tab - right? > > > > Actually, we did approve that logo as a PPMC as part of a download > promotion program: > > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/get-it-here.html > > We ran that by VP Branding as well. I could be wrong, but my > impression was he approved as well.
So what, it is still wrong and I can fix it easy enough. > > The PPMC does not control the Apache.org home page. If the ASF > decides to aggregate posts from the committers planet, then maybe that > should come with a disclaimer? Or bring in just the project blogs, > not the committer blogs? I could be talking about anything on my > blog: OpenOffice, beer. satantic rituals, bagpipes, perhaps all at > once. It probably should not automatically all be promoted to the > ASF home page. > > As for the project blogs, maybe we should just enhance the aggregator > logic on the ASF home page? For example, Google+ gets does it well, > pulling in the blog title along with the post title. Se here: > https://plus.google.com/u/0/114598373874764163668/posts/ZiRcwog5cDJ . > > If you try to fix it in the content itself, then you end up with > suboptimal results for Google+ and other places that do bring the blog > title along, ending up with something like "5 Million Downloads of > Apache OpenOffice (incubating) : Apache OpenOffice (incubating)" which > looks sloppy. > > -Rob > > > //drew > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
