On 23 Jun 2012, at 18:48, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Nick, the AOOi project does not write those tweets from @TheASF and they are > not under AOOi control. > > Are these and blog text occurrences the ones that attracted your attention or > are there others? > > If you follow the links to the referenced blog posts you will see that the > full term is used in the blog title. E.g., > <https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/5_million_downloads_of_apache>.
So what appears on www.apache.org doesn't matter? Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first struck me as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect when I read it in my feed reader: http://www.robweir.com/blog/2012/06/pache-openoffice-34-downloads.html > Would it have been sufficient to add it in the title of the individual post, > and in the first mention in the opening paragraph? I should think so, but that's just me! > How many times do you require that the qualifier be used to satisfy the > requirement for identifying incubation as the origin of a release, an > announcement, etc? If the guidelines are unclear then maybe they need reviewing? I was just pointing out usage that seems at odds with my understanding of the incubator rules. If a blog gets aggregated, then readers will see what appears in their aggregator, as I did. That's without the context of the page title in your link! -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
