Nick, the AOOi project does not write those tweets from @TheASF and they are not under AOOi control.
Are these and blog text occurrences the ones that attracted your attention or are there others? If you follow the links to the referenced blog posts you will see that the full term is used in the blog title. E.g., <https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/5_million_downloads_of_apache>. Would it have been sufficient to add it in the title of the individual post, and in the first mention in the opening paragraph? How many times do you require that the qualifier be used to satisfy the requirement for identifying incubation as the origin of a release, an announcement, etc? - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Nick Kew [mailto:n...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 00:24 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: References to "Apache OpenOffice" On 23 Jun 2012, at 06:47, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > If you identified the public places and were more specific about it, it would > help us to clean it up as appropriate. In fact the word pair "Apache OpenOffice" appears no fewer than three times on the front page www.apache.org at this moment. None of those three are qualified with any hint at its incubating status. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
