That is what I was suggesting and which Rob claims he won't need because its
so easy.
{Terse? Mobile!}
On Jun 3, 2011 3:23 PM, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 21:26 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>> Finally, I think we're exaggerating the difficulty of getting out a
>>> release of OpenOfice. LibreOffice did it very quickly. And so did IBM
>>> with Symphony. This is not rocket science.
>>
>> I am impressed by your optimism. Let us see how quickly you personally
>> manage a windows build yourself of what ends up inside the initial
>> Apache code-base (incidentally, I'm eagerly awaiting that myself, when
>> do we see it ? only after acceptance of the podling?). We could even
>> have a small race :-)
>>
>
> Stupid question time: If TDF already has the *build* infrastructure,
> then isn't *that* a clear choice of where at least some level of
> cooperation can occur.
>
> After all, the ASF provides source... the TDF could provide
> the builds?? (but that's not all, of course)...
>
> Just an idea...
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
