----- Original Message ----
> From: Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 7:56:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was:
> [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > OTOH, podlings that don't have 3 active mentors can't get 3 binding
> > votes internally, so IPMC members have to jump in sometimes. Thanks to
> > those of us who do!
>
> I view the proposal accepting the projects with the listed mentors as
> delegating the oversight to the mentors. So, I don't know if it
> should be required that you must get three IPMC members to vote on
> every little thing a podling does. I think it tends to let projects
> think that people who don't contribute anything deserve merit and have
> rights to tell them what to do. I'm not sure that sets an appropriate
> precedent.
>
> Let me put it another way: if the IPMC accepts a proposal with one
> mentor, then I'm fine with that one mentor acting on behalf of the
> IPMC without the need to constantly go back to the IPMC for approval.
> -- justin
For non-release issues, I'm fine with that. For releases I would still insist
on 3 +1's from IPMC members; if a podling can acquire those without coming
to gene...@incubator for final approval I could live with that (I'd need to
update the IPMC release guidelines tho).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
