----- Original Message ----
> From: Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:00:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
>
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> > So I found it: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >
> > Please take a look at
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
>
> [1]
> >
> > If this document is not normative, please let me know. Granted, it says
> "should" and not "must", so if there is a discussion presumably it's about
> whether "should" means "must".
> >
> > Otherwise, let's shut this discussion down and start following the rules.
> >
>
> OK then. There is something wrong with how hard that was to find though. And
> you're right, instead of "If An Artifact Contains Code Under Several
> Licenses,
> Should It Contain Several License Files?" it would be much better if it read
> "If
> An Artifact Contains Code Under Several Licenses, May It Contain Several
> License
> Files?". However, I think we should pretend it does.
It's written the way it is because we are aware that not all Apache projects
comply with the recommendation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
