On Jul 26, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi Alan,
see my 0.02€ below...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Some things to consider in this discussion:
- The 0.9.0 release cannot be performed off of the copy in ASF
- The 0.9.0 or earlier releases cannot be supported off of the
copy in ASF
Maybe that's what everyone is thinking. I just want to make
sure that it's clear.
I don't agree with either of the above opinions. We don't
restrict what people do with Apache code.
+1, except for the minimal restrictions stated in the AL 2.0.
I don't see anything wrong with publishing a release off the
artifacts stored in Apache. It cannot be called "an Apache
incubating release" but it can certainly be called JSecurity 0.9
whatever.
Follow-on releases can similarly be built from code checked into
the Apache repository. They just cannot be called "Apache
anything". And if they're published in the jsecurity.org
download area they can be maintained in the Apache repository.
The last sentence confused me a bit. Whether or not a code branch
is maintained in the Apache repo does not depend on where exactly
releases are published. Non-Apache releases are not published from
Apache servers. Code can be maintained in the Apache repo without
being Apache-released: sandboxes, experimental branches,...
I think people are missing the point that I am trying to make and
where Craig and I have different opinions.
I fully understand and support projects that are moving to the
incubator to support old versions for their community.
Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old
infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build,
maintain, and release non-ASF releases. To be sure in the case of
JSecurity the final artifacts will not use the ASF mirrors but that
does not hide the fact that they intend to build and maintain non-ASF
releases exclusively using our infrastructure.
Craig says that's fine.
I think that they should release and maintain their new and earlier
non-ASF releases on the infrastructure that they currently have or
else use ours and follow the ASF/Incubator guidelines.
Regards,
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
