On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 21:23 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old > > infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build, > > maintain, and release non-ASF releases. To be sure in the case of > > JSecurity the final artifacts will not use the ASF mirrors but that > > does not hide the fact that they intend to build and maintain non-ASF > > releases exclusively using our infrastructure. > > It should be fine to use our infrastructure to hold the source code, as long > as we don't have license pollution issues. They cannot use it to do > releases.
Can you clarify what you mean by 'releases'? They cannot use it to do ASF releases, or to do any releases at all? i.e. would it be acceptable to do a SourceForge release based upon code in the ASF repository? That is the clincher in this discussion. Regards, Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
