On Jul 26, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 26, 2008, at 1:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Follow-on releases can similarly be built from code checked
into the
Apache repository. They just cannot be called "Apache
anything". And if
they're published in the jsecurity.org download area they can
be maintained
in the Apache repository.
I'm not so sure about this. Is there a precedent for this?
Of course.
Can you provide one example? Just curious....
While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their
old project site, to minimize disruption for their existing users
while they were repackaging and cleaning up for an ASF release.
I haven't followed all of this discussion, but IIUC that's a
similar situation.
So, to make this a little more clear, when Wicket performed a few
non-ASF releases on their old project site was their old Subversion
repository shutdown and the ASF Subversion repository exclusively
used? Was work for the non-ASF release checked into and maintained
on the ASF Subversion repository? What about the older, pre-
incubation, versions of Wicket? Were they also stored and
maintained on the ASF Subversion repository?
Can anyone shed some light on these questions?
Regards,
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
