On 1/23/08, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The main point in this discussion is that not changing the package > > names is not illegal, but it's definitely uncool and goes against a > > pretty well adhered to convention. > +1 > > > Legally, all we can do is ask them > > to change the package names and if they don't, there's nothing we can > > do (at least that's what we're hearing from other folks in this > > discussion). > > I agree that's the legal situation. > > But I'm not even sure we have consensus in this group that we should > even *ask* them to change the package names. >
Then we don't ask them, since we legally haven't a leg to stand on anyway as long as they adhere to the license with respect to providing adequate notice of changes. I'm just saying/showing how uncool it would be if they didn't. :) It's ultimately up to them. > Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
