On 6/21/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CXFilre sounds good to me ;-)
Doh... replace with: CXFire
On 6/21/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/21/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Currently the plan is to leave both the old websites & docs will at the > > old locations. And XFire will be making release until Celtixfire > > releases a .0 release. I think Celtix will probably make some 1.x or > > 1.0.x releases as well. > > Given that, I think it's probably prudent to consider alternative names. > > > Is this official policy? Or do we just need to come to some consensus as > > to whether or not this will be confusing for our users? > > Our naming policy is to strive very hard not to conflict with any > other projects. If those projects are going to continue independently > of CeltiXfire, then I'd view that as a conflict we should avoid. > > Think about this from a user's perspective: What is the 'right' > version to use? Celtix? XFire? CeltiXFire? It'd seem very hard to > easily explain to the user what's going on. Therefore, I think > renaming may be the best strategy to take. It's not a decision that > has to be made right now, but I do think it's something that should be > strongly considered before graduation. -- justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
