On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:28 -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote: > Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > I thought XFire does all these specs too > > (http://xfire.codehaus.org/Stack+Comparison; except for obviously > > JAX-WSA as that's not even done yet). So what part of Celtix (other than > > the name) is in Celtixfire in that case? > > > > > Celtix has JAX-WS nearly fully done (hard to tell when the TCK isn't > available yet), where as XFire only has about 50% done. Additionally > Celtix has things like WS-RM, better JMX Integration, a better JMS > transport, etc.
OK; I knew that about Celtix anyway .. my real question was for Celtix! > I don't presume to speak for IONA, but after chatting with them a fair > amount I wouldn't let their marketing team influence your opinion of > what the project is about. Adi, can you confirm that from IONA's perspective the project is a JAX-WS implementation along with additional stuff for security, RM etc.? In other words, its an alternate WS-* stack to the stuff that's under development in the WS project (except for the JCP spec implementation focus, which the WS project doesn't have). Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
