On 6/21/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently the plan is to leave both the old websites & docs will at the old locations. And XFire will be making release until Celtixfire releases a .0 release. I think Celtix will probably make some 1.x or 1.0.x releases as well.
Given that, I think it's probably prudent to consider alternative names.
Is this official policy? Or do we just need to come to some consensus as to whether or not this will be confusing for our users?
Our naming policy is to strive very hard not to conflict with any other projects. If those projects are going to continue independently of CeltiXfire, then I'd view that as a conflict we should avoid. Think about this from a user's perspective: What is the 'right' version to use? Celtix? XFire? CeltiXFire? It'd seem very hard to easily explain to the user what's going on. Therefore, I think renaming may be the best strategy to take. It's not a decision that has to be made right now, but I do think it's something that should be strongly considered before graduation. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
