Hi Jim and Dan, Yes, Celtix team might have do point releases as well.
- Adi On 6/30/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, up until the podling can make releases, the old "external" projects still can do releases. However, it's expected that once the podling starts releases, that the 2 external ones shut down. On Jun 30, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > Hi Jim, > Even once we're in the incubator the XFire project will still have > to do releases. We have a 1.2 release in progress and will be doing > bug fix releases as well. Additionally, I would imagine IONA might > want to issue a bug fix release at some point for Celtix. I can't > really comment on them though. > > - Dan > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> We've handled these types of things before, for example >> with SpamAssassin and Cayenne, when external codebases >> were being folded into the incubator. What they've done >> is mention on the old sites that the projects are >> now ASF Incubator projects, etc... The intent is that >> until the code has been relicensed to the AL 2.0, we >> cannot host it here, but as soon as that happens, the >> old sites no longer host the current codebases, just >> the old ones. >> >> At no time should Celtix and XFire continue parallel >> development with what is in the Incubator after the >> podling has started. >> >> On Jun 30, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote: >> >>> Robert +1 >>> >>> I think also, given that I understand that the Celtix and XFire >>> projects will remain alive outside, at least for the initial future, >>> that it would help reduce confusion to have a separate and distinct >>> name for the Apache project. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> On 6/30/06, robert burrell donkin >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/21/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On 6/21/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> > > Currently the plan is to leave both the old websites & docs >>>> will at the >>>> > > old locations. And XFire will be making release until >>>> Celtixfire >>>> > > releases a .0 release. I think Celtix will probably make >>>> some 1.x or >>>> > > 1.0.x releases as well. >>>> > >>>> > Given that, I think it's probably prudent to consider >>>> alternative names. >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> > Is this official policy? Or do we just need to come to some >>>> consensus as >>>> > > to whether or not this will be confusing for our users? >>>> > >>>> > Our naming policy is to strive very hard not to conflict with any >>>> > other projects. If those projects are going to continue >>>> independently >>>> > of CeltiXfire, then I'd view that as a conflict we should avoid. >>>> >>>> >>>> i wonder as well whether iona may need to consider whether they >>>> really >>>> understand the implications of choosing this name for the >>>> apache project. >>>> the ASF would own the Apache CeltiXFire trademark and the >>>> community is very >>>> sensitive to issues around usage especially with regard to >>>> marketing. >>>> >>>> our model is different from objectweb and it is likely that the >>>> existing >>>> approach that iona takes when marketing celtix would need to be >>>> changed. >>>> apache is really centered on individuals. corporations of all >>>> kinds as well >>>> as many individuals find space to coorporate by this focus. >>>> this corporation >>>> transparency implies neutrality. AIUI this is very different to >>>> the approach >>>> taken at (for example) objectweb. >>>> >>>> in addition, it is possible that iona may wish to maintain >>>> separate patched >>>> versions of the apache codebase. this may cause difficulties if >>>> iona needed >>>> to promote these products using an apache trademark. >>>> >>>> quite a lot of energy would be required for iona to maintain >>>> marketing >>>> material making extensive use of a possible Apache CeltiXFire >>>> trademark. a >>>> growing number of projects are also known to the outside by >>>> marketing names >>>> (for example apache derby). this allows a much greater degree >>>> of freedom as >>>> well as building separate value for their corporation in their >>>> brand. >>>> >>>> this may help to explain the trend towards unique but non- >>>> descriptive names >>>> for projects. >>>> >>>> - robert >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Paul Fremantle >>> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair >>> >>> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > -- > Dan Diephouse > (616) 971-2053 > Envoi Solutions LLC > http://netzooid.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Adi Sakala http://celtix.objectweb.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
