-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Strachan wrote: > > What if folks involved in the project & on the Geronimo project don't > want it to be a TLP - at least not for a while yet? e.g. can't we > just use the Geronimo PMC until the time folks want/decide to start > to go TLP? Or is going TLP now mandatory?
Unless there is a really good reason for AMQ *not* to graduate into Geronimo, that's what will happen. At which point it will be part of Geronimo and the Geronimo PMC applies. While it's still in the incubator, though.. no, AMQ *can't* use the Geronimo PMC for oversight. AMQ's PPMC can have zero to N of the Geronimo PMC members on it, but it would also have some from the incubator (at least the mentors -- currently just you) and some committers from the podling (who would *not* be on the Geronimo PMC). Sponsoring TLPs can provide advice and guidance to podlings, but not direction -- they're self-directing. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRBgRj5rNPMCpn3XdAQLnLQP/cZMXTLLaS+/wvVXwXqzseNwA8PqUziaJ H3aRUgfzskZtYcZ0a6XNKQsIFtPbmtq7hC1Wpd3vQ6b7hYt4wmjkAsw7ZhgXH5yE p1sI1WXJvG44Mr27mQdAVF/zuAnOFaAe4yThWyR9Jp4tb95qPY56MsuDkO0y4Cd9 zBfyXY7edfY= =PKwQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
